The Legal Enforceability of a Cohabitation Contract or Agreement

June 11th, 2022 by admin No comments »

Sometimes an important question which arises with cohabitation contracts is if they should take over the secular or functional equivalent of a traditional marriage to separate the issues involved in marriage. This is because a cohabitation contract often has all of the necessary elements of the traditional legal formulation of marriage which involves a a set of rights and obligations which are enforceable. Sometimes, however, courts have equivocated on the question of whether a cohabitation contract should be allowed as a basis for dividing property, assets, the calculation of child support payments, alimony and other elements. There are now a number of states in the United States which assign the same rights and obligations to relationships codified in a cohabitation contract as are assigned in a divorce.

There is also the question of whether the cohabition contract is considered a contract in the sense that a business contract might be. There are some cases which indicate that such a contract is completely legitimate. A well known one is the case of Marvin v Marvin which was a 1964 California case that legitimised cohabitation arrangements by granting legal remedies to the persons in the couple. The case involved a famous actor and his girlfriend, Michelle. Michelle changed her last name to Marvin and lived with Mr Marvin for approximately 7 years. Both parties made contributions to the relationship. Eventually when the case was heard in the Supreme Court of California it was found that Michelle Marvin had a cohabitation contract with Mr Marvin and that she therefore had an action in breach of contract against Mr Marvin and therefore a constructive trust over half the marital property.

The same case also indicates that there are equitable remedies which are available when a person enters into a cohabitation contract. Eventually the case went on appeal to the Superior Court of California which held that the monetary award was incorrectly determined which meant that the woman that began this case was eventually left with nothing but in the process California had essentially accepted that legal rights can exist between parties to a contract for cohabitation. In other words, so long as there was not a contract for ‘sexual services’ or prostitution involved, a couple could live together informally and set their own terms for a relationship and the state would recognise this relationship.

Other states soon followed the legal principle that was developed in California and similar cases emerged in Massacheusetts immediately after the Marvin case controversy became widely known amongst lawyers and others. For this reason it can be seen that it is certainly possible that a cohabitation contract can achieve the objective of creating a legally enforceable contract between the parties to a relationship.

The Private Label and Contract Manufacturing

April 21st, 2022 by admin No comments »

Saving money on your ventures ought to be the most importantly need for your business while presenting an item on the lookout. Huge loads of cash is spent exploring and fostering the item, setting up assembling units, recruiting laborers to oversee such units. You can set aside this cash by recruiting an organization that deals with this multitude of exercises at a compelling cost.


An organization’s private mark item is one in which an outsider controls every one of its specs, yet it is sold under the brand name of the organization. These items are most pervasive in prepping and individual consideration items, pet food and extras, food and drink, and dress.


Private name items are versatile to change in purchaser conduct on the lookout. Whenever the retailers depend on providers to offer them items, then the progressions expected by the market request are slow. In any case, name producers are more brief because of changes.

On account of name items, the retailers have more command over overproduction. They can educate the mark makers to make the items with explicit elements like tone, bundling, and so forth.

Since retailers can educate the private name makers, they have command over the creation completely. In this way, they can fix the creation expenses to build their net revenue.

With private marking, the retailers can have command over the marking of the items. Since the shoppers should foster brand steadfastness, the retailers give additional consideration to the bundling and nature of items. The marked items can be tweaked by the brand worth of the item.


Generally, independent companies utilize contract fabricating. It includes employing an organization and utilizing their administrations to make the results of the organization. This saves the expense of the independent venture in setting up an industrial facility or creation unit. The employed organization centers around the creation, bundling, and even conveyance of the items now and again, while the recruiting organization centers around the advertising of the item.


Contract fabricating is helpful for saving creation expenses of the organization. They need not raise tremendous cash-flow to set up industrial facility or creation units. Likewise, a few organizations use contract producing administrations in nations where wages are low.

Other than saving the expense of setting up creation units, the organization likewise saves recruiting directors and laborers for their creation units. Likewise, they save time to zero in on different parts of the professional showcasing and selling.

Contract fabricating makes it simple for organizations to present their items inside the nation and even allows them to take the aggressive jump of growing in adjoining nations.